/
00:00
Phone
Phone
John Doe

What did you like about the course?
  • Educational effectiveness
  • Practical approach
  • Abundance of cases and expert inputs during case analysis
  • Interactions and the possibility of direct question
  • Clinical cases and sharing experience
  • Great indepth knowledge on all aspects of stress echocardiography
  • Interactive case studies after lectures.
  • The best part for me was the cases presented. They illustrated real scenarios and clear picture of how these situations are in our stress echo labs.
  • Really interesting lectures, pitched at about the right level, case studies and quiz
  • Knowledgeable and expert faculty and relevant information material
  • Expertise of the speakers
  • Case discussion
  • The cases. They were very helpful in ensuring we understood the content and the presenters did an incredible job. Content was delivered in a great manner. It was a 10/10 experience and Ilook forward to the next one.
  • The course was interesting
  • It covered every aspect of stress echo with the interaction of numerous people all day.
  • Excellent presentations, great idea to vote for the case reports
  • The non ischemic stress component
  • The speakers were cooperative
  • Presentations and case studies
  • Case reports were interesting for me as a physiologist
  • Contrast Echocardiogram
  • The case studies were interesting
  • Great overview of the topic
  • Interactive discussions, information in lectures was highly relevant to current practice
  • Excellent speakers, good tech, interactive
  • Online with in depth information on ischaemia and valve/structural issues with some cases tudies
  • Content - it was thorough but not too over my head
  • Practical tips
  • The ischemia evaluation part
  • Online so I didn’t need to travel I live away from Europe
  • Valves content
  • Very nformative, well structured
  • Help me increase knowledge about stress echo
  • Kind experts with lovely discussions
  • The lecturers were opened to give answers. Every important topic was mentioned.
  • To have the opportunity to review the presentations during a short period of time
  • Very practical. Pitfalls highlighted.
  • Covering the whole range of possibilities and experiences in stress echo
  • Useful, concetrated information for professionals, owerview of all stress echo madalities
  • Clear exposure
  • I was able to watch the course live on-line and ask questions if I wanted from experts and at the same time I can rewatch the presentations on demand. If the course would have been onsite , I wouldn't been able to attend. Perfect price, would have been a pity to miss it.
  • Range of speakers
  • Everything was amazing
  • The case reports were really good and helpfull
  • Clearly everyone involved was very knowledgeable which made the course very interesting. Having a lot of cases was also good.
What could have been done better?

(we listened: more case reports, voting improvement, two days instead of one day course, 10 min. for discussions, „almost live case“ now back in programme…)

  • More discussion time
  • More more case report
  • More time for discussion and questions
  • I think it would be good to have a live presentation of one patient, a presentation of the entire test procedure with preparation and execution, and analysis.
  • Number of cases
  • longer lunch break. stick to timings. shorter inbetween intervals so day not so long.
  • Longer echo clips for me to observe- it was too short and I was not able to completely evaluate every echo view
  • Everything was great, if you have possibility for 2 days course, one day dedicated to casereports would be perfect
  • Long day!! however really great and very accesible
  • Very packed day , could have split into two days
  • I'd prefer adding a small 5-8 minutes section before each lecture with title, "How toperform/How to Image" - this sections should focus on how to "techniques" to acquire optimalimages, use of probe, echo window, machine optimization settings, pitfalls, tips and tricksespecially in context of lung, CFR, Myocardial perfusion, and some for RWMA
  • For one day too much information. And none of the session ended at planned time.
  • Maybe some bits for the physiologist rather than clinicians though most of it was pitched at the right level.
  • Longer breaks between lectures
  • Video cases should be available beside the questions for attendees to answer
  • Nothing one of the best on-line courses I've ever been on
  • More time for case studies
  • I am new to stress echo and a lot of the content was too advanced for me. An online basic course would be fantastic
  • More often
  • Maybe more practical teaching - tutorials, videos of performing exams
  • I'm an experienced stress echo sonographer and was able to understand the content. Thecontent felt more advanced and potentially daunting for someone new wanting to startperforming stress echo. I would like more interactive case based discussion. Over 2 days might be beneficial.
  • Maybe less break would make the course more compact. Weekend or friday afternoon wouldmake it easier to attend live.
  • Practical hands on site
  • Be nice if I could attend in person